From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: 100% (was: [PATCH] diffcore-rename: favour identical basenames) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:49:02 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070621030622.GD8477@spearce.org> <20070621131915.GD4487@coredump.intra.peff.net> <467B777D.C47BFE0E@eudaptics.com> <86ps3oi7ma.fsf_-_@lola.quinscape.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 22 14:49:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I1iZb-00064K-Iv for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:49:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753001AbXFVMtK (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:49:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753643AbXFVMtJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:49:09 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39522 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753001AbXFVMtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:49:08 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2007 12:49:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 22 Jun 2007 14:49:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+dNpQ9iRedsoL9VSyucneGbECXe2sC7nf/FpSviq gjZHGhM88acEr2 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <86ps3oi7ma.fsf_-_@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, David Kastrup wrote: > As a note aside: would it be possible to always round downwards when > computing similarities or converting between them? I'd rather not. This would be counterintuitive. People expect rounded values. > I very much would like to see the 100% figure reserved for identity. > This is particularly relevant when interpreting the output of git-diff > --name-status with regard to R100, C100 and similar flags. You should never depend on the output of --name-status if you're interested in identifying identical files, but on the object names. Ciao, Dscho