From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] filter-branch documentation: some more touch-ups. Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:58:18 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070703220540.GN12721@planck.djpig.de> <1183534367401-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, Frank Lichtenheld , j.sixt@eudaptics.com To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 04 12:58:32 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I62Z6-00008u-0K for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:58:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755534AbXGDK6a (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:58:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756128AbXGDK63 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:58:29 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57685 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754330AbXGDK63 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 06:58:29 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jul 2007 10:58:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 04 Jul 2007 12:58:26 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+1ZPkP2fq1KAgqn3sDecRW2/XASU+SYtPC5FP14k uPClzdxRInfqPE X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <1183534367401-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > - The map function used to fail, but no longer does (since 3520e1e8687.) > - Fix the "edge-graft" example. > - Show the same using .git/info/grafts. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt > --- > > I think that "edge-graft" makes more sense than "etch-graft". > Native speakers, please? I looked at dict.leo.org, and it does not know either version. Maybe it is just "graft"? Except for that, Acked-by: Johannes E. Schindelin > I tried the example, and its quoting was incorrect. The reason is that > the shell removes the single quotes even if they are in the middle of > a word; so they didn't end up in the eval'd script and made sed barf. Thanks for sanity checking. It looked so obviously correct to me that I did not bother checking, but your are correct, they were broken. Unfortunately, I even would have missed it writing a test case, because that need an extra level of quoting! Ciao, Dscho