From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: efficient way to filter several branches with common history? Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 15:28:15 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <652B0F85-D0E4-4BF0-8DFC-212B6C0650AF@zib.de> <468B5C4B.26F5E90B@eudaptics.com> <6DC0E50A-CAD3-453E-BD9C-73E51EDD5785@zib.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johannes Sixt , Git Mailing List To: Steffen Prohaska X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 04 16:28:28 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I65qG-00089Z-I3 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2007 16:28:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760517AbXGDO2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:28:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759529AbXGDO2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:28:25 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47443 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758750AbXGDO2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:28:25 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jul 2007 14:28:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 04 Jul 2007 16:28:23 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/cRwZBUrHc021veNalqfLDgYzCg5j/Hoxfcn3ofi k2TbUvCFsVidSP X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <6DC0E50A-CAD3-453E-BD9C-73E51EDD5785@zib.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > On Jul 4, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote: > > > Steffen Prohaska wrote: > > > > > > Is there an efficient way to filter several branches at once > > > through git-filter-branch? > > > > That feature is not yet implemented. > > > > In the meantime do it this way: > > > > [...] > > Thanks for your explanation. The following is the template I used > to build my fully automated version of what you proposed: > > [...] Since you seem quite proficient in shell, why not implement this feature in filter-branch (which is a shell script) to begin with? Ciao, Dscho