From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git init: activate rerere by default Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 18:15:29 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <81b0412b0707050610mddaf5c0w724b747fe10ed6f9@mail.gmail.com> <7vsl82dcj0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Alex Riesen , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 05 19:15:49 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I6Uvi-0000XG-L9 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:15:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757389AbXGERPn (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:15:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756674AbXGERPn (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:15:43 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52489 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756651AbXGERPm (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:15:42 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Jul 2007 17:15:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 05 Jul 2007 19:15:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19q1s8jALJq2uRz+xLJ3Y5LsDquw9xqo40OpcAf2D eF+jNdIRxgs7yZ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vsl82dcj0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Alex Riesen" writes: > > > On 7/5/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> > >> We have a working implementation of rerere since long ago, and we even > >> make sure that it works as expected in a test case. It is also a very > >> useful feature, so why not turn it on for the benefit of users who are > >> not even aware of it? This patch does that. > > > > Maybe just create in template directory? > > Sounds saner. Does it? I had the impression that the templates are meant for site-specific modifications. My patch tried to make it more standard than that. For example, you _could_ have set core.logallrefupdates from the templates, yet you chose not to, but rather hard-wire it into "git init". Which I completely agree to. Ciao, Dscho