From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-apply{,mbox,patch} should default to --unidiff-zero
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 04:16:08 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707060413190.4093@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070706022629.GL3492@stusta.de>
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 02:51:07AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > > You must do something like "diff -U0" or manually editing patches
> > > for creating such patches, and that's very unusual.
> >
> > The point is that the _committer_ is not necessarily involved in that
> > business.
BTW this still holds true, and you have not addressed that. It really is
a serious issue. "git apply" is a committer's tool. So it should help
the committer.
> > And "git apply" is strict for a reason. It catches possibly unwanted
> > things much earlier than patch. I _want_ to be warned that somebody is
> > introducing some code at a certain position, which might, or might not
> > be correct. apply has no way to tell, since there is no context to at
> > least minimally verify.
> >...
>
> That's wrong.
>
> My use cases are replacing or deleting lines.
That is _your_ use case.
> In these cases there is context in the deleted lines that is already
> being verified even with --unidiff-zero.
With --unidiff-zero, also _adding_ lines will be handled as if there were
no problem.
Yes, in your case it fixes a problem.
Yet, in other cases it introduces a problem.
Okay?
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-06 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-05 23:22 git-apply{,mbox,patch} should default to --unidiff-zero Adrian Bunk
2007-07-06 1:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-06 1:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-06 1:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-07-06 2:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-06 3:16 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2007-07-06 4:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-06 5:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-07-06 12:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-06 12:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0707060413190.4093@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).