From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Re: Empty directories... Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:43:30 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <85644hxujp.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85abttwa7m.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <7vbqe93qtv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070719053858.GE32566@spearce.org> <20070719060922.GF32566@spearce.org> <20070719105105.GA4929@moonlight.home> <86wswwa8ej.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <7FE87F7A-53AD-4B92-8F33-ECDFAE6A7EFB@silverinsanity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Kastrup , git@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Gernhardt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 19 17:44:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IBYAi-0007Rh-VJ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:44:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937158AbXGSPni (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:43:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S937118AbXGSPnh (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:43:37 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:60268 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S934832AbXGSPng (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:43:36 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2007 15:43:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 19 Jul 2007 17:43:33 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19AzwJZiIZA+4QV8UVeP6BWsG/q55zlXrEZo+f5lT upqR7wE1jencmb X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7FE87F7A-53AD-4B92-8F33-ECDFAE6A7EFB@silverinsanity.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Brian Gernhardt wrote: > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:24 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > > I think that the placeholder name should rather be ".". > > For what it's worth, the more this gets discussed, the more I think your > idea is a good one. I do not like it at all. "." already has a very special meaning. It is a _directory_, no place holder. More and more I get the impression that this thread is just not worth it. The problem was solved long ago, and all that is talked about here is how to complicate things. Unhappy, Dscho