From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [Bradford C. Smith] [PATCH 2/2] use lockfile.c routines in git_commit_set_multivar() Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 04:31:54 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <7v7ioocatt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 26 05:32:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDu57-0008VD-0k for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:32:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757571AbXGZDb7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:31:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757030AbXGZDb7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:31:59 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36774 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757519AbXGZDb6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:31:58 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2007 03:31:56 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO openvpn-client) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2007 05:31:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/BuDoze8rBoB8XxsCJPr045sDQNuHad0jvbP83c/ vIQl2e3aDChPNq X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v7ioocatt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > From: "Bradford C. Smith" > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] use lockfile.c routines in git_commit_set_multivar() > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:49:53 -0400 > Message-Id: <11853821962210-git-send-email-bradford.carl.smith@gmail.com> > > Changed git_commit_set_multivar() to use the routines provided by > lockfile.c to reduce code duplication and ensure consistent behavior. > > Signed-off-by: "Bradford C. Smith" > > Dscho, I think this is worth doing regardless of that "symlinked > config" issue. I haven't followed the code closely enough, > though. > > What do you think? I think that I will review it tomorrow; this darned work-tree stuff took way longer than expected. Ciao, Dscho