From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@lang.hm Subject: Re: merge time Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <241612.78983.qm@web51007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <6FE9FFD6-B5D7-4E1D-A4E8-B6D0E9517503@zib.de> <7vbqdumlo1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070730074937.GT20052@spearce.org> <577C7529-4C3C-40D4-B86A-8B3CE888C997@zib.de> <20070730081439.GA907@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20070730083223.GB3150@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Steffen Prohaska , "Shawn O. Pearce" , Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds , Matthew L Foster , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 30 10:36:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IFQjc-000770-6G for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:36:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760561AbXG3IgI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:36:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760423AbXG3IgH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:36:07 -0400 Received: from dsl081-033-126.lax1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.33.126]:43779 "EHLO bifrost.lang.hm" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760132AbXG3IgG (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:36:06 -0400 Received: from asgard (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id l6U8ZadP008109; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 01:35:36 -0700 X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm In-Reply-To: <20070730083223.GB3150@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:25:25AM +0200, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > >> I agree. But I think except for being 'fake' there shouldn't be any >> problems with the extra commit. > > Problems, no. But it will look ugly when browsing history. :) yes, but this entire thread was an attempt to avoid browsing the history and instead figure out the relationships between commits by dates. so the people wanting this don't care how ugly it makes the history (but since they want to do this in other people's repositories this won't work for them either) David Lang