From: david@lang.hm
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rob@landley.net
Subject: possible bug in git apply?
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:45:23 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708041243070.6905@asgard.lang.hm> (raw)
since git doesn't track directories, only content (per the big discussion
recently) I beleive that doing a checkout would leave Rob without the
directories that he emptied out, so shouldn't git apply also clear the
directories to end up in the same state?
David Lang
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:19:54 -0400
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Group architecture Documentation under
Documentation/arch.
On Saturday 04 August 2007 2:03:59 pm Rob Landley wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> Amiga part Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>
> Move architecture-specific Documentation into a common subdirectory.
I really, really, really hate git.
Ok, on my laptop I just noticed that "git apply" of the patch didn't complain
but it also left the empty subdirectories it moved stuff out of. (I don't
believe this happened on the version of git I was using on my previous
laptop, which ate itself a month and change ago, but obviously I can't
check.)
There is no "git rmdir". "git rm" refuses to delete the directory
without -r. "git rm -r Documentation/x86_64" listed (as just deleted) all
the files that the patch already moved out of the directory.
Am I missing something obvious here?
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-04 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-04 19:45 david [this message]
2007-08-04 20:00 ` possible bug in git apply? Junio C Hamano
2007-08-04 20:08 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-05 4:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-05 4:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-05 5:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-05 7:55 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-05 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-05 17:53 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-05 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-05 18:50 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-05 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-05 19:37 ` David Kastrup
2007-08-06 8:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-08-06 9:37 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0708041243070.6905@asgard.lang.hm \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).