From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] user-manual: mention git gui citool (commit, amend) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:48:06 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070803125634.GB28323@fieldses.org> <1186318785677-git-send-email-prohaska@zib.de> <17AA7EBE-B755-4F26-9C7E-AF6D762811F2@zib.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Steffen Prohaska X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 05 16:48:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IHhPP-0004ps-UC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:48:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752325AbXHEOsl (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:48:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752403AbXHEOsl (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:48:41 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:37866 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752213AbXHEOsk (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:48:40 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Aug 2007 14:48:39 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO openvpn-client) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 05 Aug 2007 16:48:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18wdrBpEv0wsjCsBn2VzOsoRHw0PLIho22KgZlSga tlsz7nbI1Jj0nB X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <17AA7EBE-B755-4F26-9C7E-AF6D762811F2@zib.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > On Aug 5, 2007, at 3:58 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > > > > > git gui is especially useful because it allows to select diff hunks. > > > > You should give a _big_ _fat_ _red_ warning there. > > > > If you selectively commit diff hunks, you _never_ tested what you > > committed. > > > > That is the reason we're not advertising git add -i more actively. > > Hmm... If you do 'git cherry-pick' or 'git rebase' you also did > not test what you committed. Should we advertise them less > actively as well? But you have that state in your working tree! Big difference there! Ciao, Dscho