From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: way to automatically add untracked files? Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:17:38 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <873ayymzc1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <200708060946.12793.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Miles Bader To: Johan Herland X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 06 14:18:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1II1Xc-0008S3-CR for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:18:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751558AbXHFMSQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:18:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751833AbXHFMSQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:18:16 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:37988 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751517AbXHFMSP (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:18:15 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Aug 2007 12:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 06 Aug 2007 14:18:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+/IdFunfO/peEimlOS5RYTTqnL2zDS2nLUNnxoIp bCannRMGcxL39w X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200708060946.12793.johan@herland.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > On Monday 06 August 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > >> But I'm wondering whether we'd want to include it in git by default > > > >> (instead of having to tell confused users to add the alias). > > > > > > > > I recommend against that, too. All too often, I have some temporary files > > > > in the working tree, and I'll be dimmed if I'm the only one. So > > > > "addremove" adds too much possibility for pilot errors. > > > > > > "Recommend against it"? Why? > > > > Didn't I say that? It just _asks_ for pilot errors. > > Ok, in that spirit I also suggest removing _all_ git plumbing-level commands > from the default installation. Oh, come on. You were talking about a porcelain command. Ciao, Dscho