From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add --show-touched option to show "diff --git" line when contents are unchanged Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:26:58 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <7v4pjj5fp6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46B1F3F4.5030504@midwinter.com> <20070803053717.GA16379@midwinter.com> <7v4pjc9czm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Steven Grimm , Jean-Fran?ois Veillette , Matthieu Moy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 08 10:27:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IIgtS-00020x-OD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 10:27:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754097AbXHHI1p (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:27:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754956AbXHHI1o (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:27:44 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43176 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751024AbXHHI1l (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 04:27:41 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Aug 2007 08:27:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 08 Aug 2007 10:27:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18bc2961ugbI9P7wjW5GKhbtACUxreyTsaqszHYjG uvTWBzLlL0WcuQ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Everybody who takes patches will accept crud afterwards, since the > normal thing is to email them around, so there's no real downside to > adding some status output at the end. It shouldn't screw anything up, > but people will hopefully notice (sure, if you exit the pager without > looking at it all you wouldn't notice, but that's _already_ true, so..) But then, you could output the message _twice_: first possibly in-between patches ("WARNING: ...") and then at the end. However, I have the slight suspicion that people will not even notice. I mean, we had bug reports on merge-recursive, where the reporter failed to even acknowledge the fact that merge-recursive said that there were conflicts, and even listed them. So I have the slight suspicion that all this will accomplish is "shut the darn thing up", and old-timers will have a harder time, since they no longer spot easily when they did a Dumb Thing and left the index out of sync. Slightly negative. Ciao, Dscho