From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Add --rebase option to git-pull? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:23:00 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <550f9510708300540u13c77201oe7cbe599c6773364@mail.gmail.com> <550f9510708300810y1ca84e8dt4d0bab8fc99deb3c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Clarke X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 30 17:23:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IQlra-0001RJ-Rd for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:23:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757589AbXH3PXK (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:23:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756827AbXH3PXJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:23:09 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:59213 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758014AbXH3PXI (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2007 11:23:08 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2007 15:23:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 30 Aug 2007 17:23:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Hw/cQl8CHU0zZC2uldPjHx6fgPPon2eEXvl6KS0 Ta+sbXx4WW7+tf X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <550f9510708300810y1ca84e8dt4d0bab8fc99deb3c@mail.gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Tom Clarke wrote: > On 8/30/07, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > In my TODO, there is "add the 'rebase' strategy". It is definitely > > something post-1.5.3, so I do not look into it. But the most logical > > place for me would be to have a strategy 'rebase'. IOW a > > git-merge-rebase.sh. > > The following is my first naive attempt, is this the kind of thing you > were thinking of? Looks good to me except for: > +git update-index --refresh 2>/dev/null Maybe a test case would be in order, too... Thanks, Dscho