From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: cvsimport bug on branches [was: conversion to git] Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:22:04 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <8D5EA3F4-9642-4604-963E-838D03650FBC@zib.de> <200709211915.35642.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Linus Torvalds , Steffen Prohaska , Eric Blake , m4-patches@gnu.org, Jim Meyering , git@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Rosenberg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 21 22:23:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYp1q-0004aF-L9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:23:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753974AbXIUUXF (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:23:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752368AbXIUUXD (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:23:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:40340 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750807AbXIUUXB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:23:01 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2007 20:22:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 22:22:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX181LBkEnjw1OM0wiygi0bOxzyxYHFDUOcQ9otR6Br TvtzboOT9kTwFW X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200709211915.35642.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > fredag 21 september 2007 skrev Linus Torvalds: > > > > The big advantage of git-cvsimport is that it can do incremental > > imports, which I don't think the other methods do. But if there is any > > choice at all, and especially if you're not that interested in the > > incremental feature (ie you can cut over to git, and perhaps use > > git-cvsserver to "supprt" CVS users) the other CVS importers are > > likely to be much better. > > fromcvs does incremental import and it's very fast and uses much less > memory than cvsimport. It needs the rcs files however and will not > convert non-branch tags. Plus you have to install Ruby. Just wanted people to know. Ciao, Dscho