From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-commit --amend: respect grafted parents. Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:47:49 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <11908086961933-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <46FA5604.101@viscovery.net> <46FA6CD7.1020709@viscovery.net> <7vd4w51csv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johannes Sixt , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 26 21:49:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iacsa-0000li-4M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:49:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757615AbXIZTs4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754241AbXIZTs4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:56 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:38120 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756844AbXIZTsz (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:55 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2007 19:48:53 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO openvpn-client) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2007 21:48:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+2UC41iCu2IPfA9DsR6SAf4yU2VHPl6TYpd2T0wZ HshVuQdscISUm+ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vd4w51csv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Sixt writes: > > > Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > >> The reason why I insist on not putting this into --amend is that I > >> think this is not really an amend, but actively a rewrite of the > >> merge commit. > > > > You have a point here. I'm convinced. Scrap the patch. > > I am slow today. Since when --amend is not about "a rewrite of commit"? Technically, you are right, of course. Commit objects are immutable. But from a _porcelain_ view I maintain that "amending" is about changes _to_ a commit. It is not about redefining the (a) parent. Ciao, Dscho