From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary (long) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:16:34 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <8fe92b430710040212u332bb4e5yfa6c10b8236c6301@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 04 18:10:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IdTHb-0007Yo-3w for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:10:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759529AbXJDQGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:06:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762189AbXJDQG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:06:29 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:56640 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1762180AbXJDQG2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:06:28 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2007 16:06:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp047) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2007 18:06:26 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX191H9IGyZZ1Jzn5en+hO3D+DV1jUwOf6z86+plNPJ sPafxlbBwNSc8f X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <8fe92b430710040212u332bb4e5yfa6c10b8236c6301@mail.gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > This is partial summary of Git User's Survey 2007, > ending at state from 28 September 2007. Thanks. > 26. Which porcelains do you use? > > Multiple answers (one can use more than one porcelain). > > Answer (multiple choice) | Count > ------------------------------------------ > core-git | 558 > cogito (deprecated) | 56 > > Patch management interface: : 57 > ........................................... > StGIT | 41 > Guilt (formerly gq) | 13 > pg (deprecated) | 3 > > own scripts | 95 > other | 14 > ------------------------------------------ > Base | 593 / 683 > Total (sum) | 780 > > Those 14 "other" answers make me wish to have provided "if other, > what it was?" (sub)question; actually not only for this question. git-gui, of course. I consider it porcelain, because it uses core-git as backend. In the same vein, I should consider gitk porcelain now, since it has rebase capabilities. I will not, and I am not very happy that this viewer got a non-view-only capability, instead of git-gui, where that feature should have belonged (as suggested by at least one answer to a later question in the survey -- not by me). Ciao, Dscho