Re: Spam: Re: git branch performance problem?

[Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>]

Hi,

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Mike Ralphson wrote:

> It's not something I've really looked into, but there seems to be a
> reflogs mechanism which can temporarily pin an otherwise unreferenced
> object so it doesn't get deleted. Would it be possible to populate the
> remote's view of referenced objects into this, at the point of clone,
> push or pull, which would seem to be the points at which this might be
> changing.
> 
> Obviously this is of no use if you're 'anonymously' poncing off a
> third repo to save clone time, but if you're in control of both repo's
> it might be useful.

I cannot really allege that I understood what you were trying to say, but 
I guess you want to use clone to get rid of objects you just threw out by 
either filter-branch or deleting a branch.

The answer is that the file:// as well as the git:// protocol will do 
that.  For local clones, they are not the default, since they are slower 
than hardlinking.

Hth,
Dscho