From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: RE: Switching from CVS to GIT Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:34:59 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1773C6F0-87BE-4F3C-B68A-171E1F32E242@lrde.epita.fr><47125F74.9050600@op5.se><47126957.1020204@op5.se><20071014221446.GC2776@steel.home> <20071015174922.GC2966@steel.home> <030301c80f58$d37b9710$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: 'Alex Riesen' , ae@op5.se, git@vger.kernel.org, make-w32@gnu.org To: Dave Korn X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 15 20:55:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IhUnd-0000gR-PM for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:36:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934043AbXJOSfM (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:35:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763843AbXJOSfK (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:35:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39520 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933898AbXJOSfG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:35:06 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2007 18:35:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 20:35:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/A2hRvlzrAskyxXzS9SFXxkjHyJixfSjtMKprLbo GNZk51+IahsdJU X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <030301c80f58$d37b9710$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Dave Korn wrote: > On 15 October 2007 18:49, Alex Riesen wrote: > > > Johannes Schindelin, Mon, Oct 15, 2007 10:44:12 +0200: > >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> Can you show a test case where this penalty is clearly visible? I'm > >>> curious to see the numbers. TIA > > ... > >> Now, that is my _personal_ decision. If _you_ have no problem with > >> Windows, just stick with it. (I always thought this goes without saying, > >> but Windows users tend to be very religious about this issue, thinking > >> just because I hate Windows that I want to make them switch. Hahaha, no.) > > > > They tend to be so exactly because they know how pathetic they are. > > They just want to have something where they don't suck and do > > everything to find it. And fail. Then they resort to graphics and > > user-friendly interface. > > Translation: "I feel that I am superior to other people. This post > has no content apart from me shooting my mouth off in an attempt to > prove how much cleverer I am than anyone else. However apart from my > self-love I have no contribution to make to the discussion." > > This isn't slashdot. A computer is just a tool, and it's really *you* > who are being pathetic, because you confuse a choice of > mass-manufactured consumer product with a statement about personal > identity. Loyalty to your favourite brand is a game of one-upmanship > suitable only for kids. You need to grow up. I sense a classical Stockholm Syndrome here ;-) Ciao, Dscho