From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Switching from CVS to GIT Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:18:10 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1192293466.17584.95.camel@homebase.localnet> <1192381040.4908.57.camel@homebase.localnet> <1773C6F0-87BE-4F3C-B68A-171E1F32E242@lrde.epita.fr> <47125F74.9050600@op5.se> <47126957.1020204@op5.se> <20071014221446.GC2776@steel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: barkalow@iabervon.org, raa.lkml@gmail.com, ae@op5.se, tsuna@lrde.epita.fr, git@vger.kernel.org To: Eli Zaretskii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 16 17:18:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IhoBj-0000Fc-6Z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:18:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933948AbXJPPSU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:18:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933921AbXJPPST (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:18:19 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:53461 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933902AbXJPPSS (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:18:18 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2007 15:18:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2007 17:18:16 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19o105Hd71oz9nQjDRMRdzcfJiYUV4pWyRKUSrX9g y+GZ8Xq+uSIHFL X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:24:34 +0100 (BST) > > From: Johannes Schindelin > > cc: barkalow@iabervon.org, raa.lkml@gmail.com, ae@op5.se, tsuna@lrde.epita.fr, > > git@vger.kernel.org > > > > Funny. Last time I checked the toolbar went away, as well as the desktop, > > when I killed explorer.exe. > > That's a ``feature'': Explorer is the parent of all the desktop > display. Kinda like the login shell on Unix: if you kill it, there > goes your whole session. Except that on Windows, the OS pays > attention and restarts Explorer right away to get you back in > business. (In first versions of Windows, there was no restarting of > Explorer, so if you killed it, you needed to reboot :-() I kinda knew that. But what's now with your recommendation to never run Explorer? Ciao, Dscho