From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary continued Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:45:05 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <8fe92b430710081355i7d3dbaa2q9a8939b55d7ca7dc@mail.gmail.com> <1192827476.4522.93.camel@cacharro.xalalinux.org> <4719B655.90204@op5.se> <8fe92b430710201606i47e85b24k17abd819bf0d353b@mail.gmail.com> <471AFD07.4040606@op5.se> <471C586A.9030900@op5.se> <8fe92b430710220526i65ecb862ie1037e9d94d93b83@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andreas Ericsson , Steffen Prohaska , Federico Mena Quintero , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 22 15:45:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ijxb9-0003v6-R3 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:45:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752656AbXJVNp2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:45:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752632AbXJVNp2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:45:28 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55147 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752487AbXJVNp1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:45:27 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2007 13:45:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 22 Oct 2007 15:45:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/aXDoFmOPaOGH+yrkkHCSARnM+VN1sOJKyoXVqWJ X2PTKGCYVs0tTu X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <8fe92b430710220526i65ecb862ie1037e9d94d93b83@mail.gmail.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > On 10/22/07, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > [...] > >>>>> On 10/20/07, Steffen Prohaska wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Maybe we could group commands into more categories? > > > Similarly, it might be helpful to have help topics the gdb way, like > > "git help patches". It's one of those things that people have come to > > expect from a software tool, so perhaps we should humor them? Given gits > > "every help topic is a man-page" idiom, this shouldn't require any real > > technical effort. > > > > Such topics should probably include > > merge/merges/merging - overview of various ways of putting two lines of > > development back together > > patch/patches - how to create, send and apply > > tags/branches/refs - what they are, why they're good, link to merging > > Very good idea. It is definitely something that can be worked on. > > By the way, what do you think about "spying" version of git, specially > marked release which gathers statistics of porcelain used, with > frequency of its use, and git-sendstats command added in this release? I like Wincent's approach, scanning .bash_history. Ciao, Dscho