From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Recording merges after repo conversion Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:03:59 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <200710311343.58414.johan@herland.net> <200710311537.30384.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Peter Karlsson , Lars Hjemli , Benoit SIGOURE To: Johan Herland X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 31 16:05:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1InF7s-0007Yu-9w for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:05:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756960AbXJaPEo (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:04:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756648AbXJaPEn (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:04:43 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33091 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755985AbXJaPEn (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:04:43 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2007 15:04:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 31 Oct 2007 16:04:41 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19eR3pAvFFeP8JvHdFbvdyKWnlwlsEU2dxIYngDIE HVov4ib3p4Ve0T X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <200710311537.30384.johan@herland.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > All this does not change the fact that installing a graft and 'git gc > > --prune'ing gets rid of the old history. D'oh. > > So will rebasing and --prune'ing, or pulling a rebased branch and > --prune'ing. Git already gives you _plenty_ of different ropes to hang > yourself with. The question is whether adding yet another one is worth > it. But that is not the question here. The question here is: are users allowed to hang _others_? I say: no. Ciao, Dscho