From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out. Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:27:54 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1194289301-7800-1-git-send-email-madcoder@debian.org> <7vlk9cmiyq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vsl3kjdct.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vode8j7o5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v8x5bi703.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Steven Grimm , Pierre Habouzit , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 06 19:29:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpTAy-0007MH-58 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:29:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754195AbXKFS2x (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:28:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754125AbXKFS2x (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:28:53 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:59154 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751991AbXKFS2w (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:28:52 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Nov 2007 18:28:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 06 Nov 2007 19:28:49 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/OFLZhdILOWEn5rOprXqyMcIYDr4CwJnUTzHum+M VMEF7HA1v5KV1a X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v8x5bi703.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert " to mean "revert the > > changes to , relative to the index" (which would be the same as "git > > checkout "), then committing that change just does not make sense. > > > > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert > > ". > > Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. > > Really, I wonder how difficult git is for people who are not > brainwashed by cvs/svn, and unfortunately enough, partly by bzr and hg. > From a user perspective, you might be correct. But then we have to > add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. > Not what I want. [06:46] > > I am wondering who said it ;-). Now, that is not fair, using my own words against me ;-) Ciao, Dscho