From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out. Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 22:21:18 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1194289301-7800-1-git-send-email-madcoder@debian.org> <7vlk9cmiyq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vsl3kjdct.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vode8j7o5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v8x5bi703.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071106193959.GB4382@artemis.corp> <7vir4fgnz1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Pierre Habouzit , Steven Grimm , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 06 23:22:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IpWoa-0003RS-1D for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:22:32 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754437AbXKFWWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:22:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754586AbXKFWWS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:22:18 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:38410 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753330AbXKFWWR (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:22:17 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Nov 2007 22:22:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO openvpn-client) [138.251.11.103] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 06 Nov 2007 23:22:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18AxCZaItkAOBwTTCc3nlA9S6GRuvabCD1I4+H/hm 4XiSIvRxpD3cdV X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vir4fgnz1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Pierre Habouzit writes: > > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:27:54PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > >> > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> > > >> > > Well, I think that _if_ we allow "git revert " to mean > >> > > "revert the changes to , relative to the index" (which > >> > > would be the same as "git checkout "), then committing that > >> > > change just does not make sense. > >> > > > >> > > And it is this behaviour that people are seeking, not "git revert > >> > > ". > >> > > >> > Heh, I found this in the recent log somewhere. > >> > > >> > Really, I wonder how difficult git is for people who are not > >> > brainwashed by cvs/svn, and unfortunately enough, partly by bzr > >> > and hg. > >> > From a user perspective, you might be correct. But then we > >> > have to add 1000 commands to reflect the English language. > >> > Not what I want. [06:46] > >> > > >> > I am wondering who said it ;-). > >> > >> Now, that is not fair, using my own words against me ;-) > > > > That's very funny actually :] > > Yeah, it was doubly funny after I saw you posted a list of "$scm revert" > and Dscho still sided with you in that thread. Hey, I had my nice 5 minutes for the day, so give me a break! ;-) Ciao, Dscho