From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing inside_work_tree setting in setup_git_directory_gently
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 20:54:08 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711072053490.4362@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vve8daisu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 09:33:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >>
> >> Please add automated test script for this, thanks.
> >
> > Thank you for reminding. I tried to put a test in
> > t1501-worktree.sh and found out core.worktree can override
> > inside_work_tree previously set by setup_git_directory_gently(),
> > activating the worktree code in setup_git_directory() again.
> >
> > This made me think setup_git_directory_gently() should use
> > get_git_work_tree() instead. But then git_work_tree_cfg may not be
> > initialized when get_git_work_tree() is called (starting from
> > setup_git_directory(), git_work_tree_cfg is initialized in
> > check_repository_format_version(), which is called _after_
> > setup_git_directory_gently()).
> >
> > The interaction between these variables and functions is really beyond
> > my knowledge. Johannes, can you have a look at this? In theory the
> > following test should pass:
> >
> > diff --git a/t/t1501-worktree.sh b/t/t1501-worktree.sh
> > index 7ee3820..bdb7720 100755
> > --- a/t/t1501-worktree.sh
> > +++ b/t/t1501-worktree.sh
> > @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ test_expect_success 'repo finds its work tree from work tree, too' '
> > test sub/dir/tracked = "$(git ls-files)")
> > '
> >
> > +test_expect_success 'Try a command from subdir in worktree' '
> > + (cd repo.git/work/sub &&
> > + GIT_DIR=../.. GIT_WORK_TREE=.. git blame dir/tracked)
> > +'
> > +
> > test_expect_success '_gently() groks relative GIT_DIR & GIT_WORK_TREE' '
> > cd repo.git/work/sub/dir &&
> > GIT_DIR=../../.. GIT_WORK_TREE=../.. GIT_PAGER= \
>
> I am wondering what happened to this thread...
It is still in my inbox, waiting for a time where I can actually
concentrate.
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-07 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 10:03 [PATCH] Add missing inside_work_tree setting in setup_git_directory_gently Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2007-11-03 11:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
[not found] ` <fcaeb9bf0711030457se2f5f5bpd9aa463e878cd621@mail.gmail.com>
2007-11-03 12:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-03 13:18 ` Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2007-11-03 13:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 4:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-04 7:03 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2007-11-07 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-07 20:54 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2007-11-09 11:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-09 11:34 ` [PATCH] builtin-blame: set up the work_tree before the first file access Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0711072053490.4362@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).