From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Barkalow Subject: Deprecate git-fetch-pack? Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:11:53 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 11 00:12:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IqzUo-0002ke-EK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:12:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755063AbXKJXLz (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:11:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755057AbXKJXLz (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:11:55 -0500 Received: from iabervon.org ([66.92.72.58]:44441 "EHLO iabervon.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754978AbXKJXLz (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:11:55 -0500 Received: (qmail 10738 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Nov 2007 23:11:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Nov 2007 23:11:53 -0000 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Now that git-fetch is in C, built in, and doing the fetch-pack in the same process, the normal usage patterns don't involve actually executing git-fetch-pack. Can we deprecate it at this point, or it is plausibly being used by scripts? As it is now, I'm not entirely confidant that the tests in t5500 won't be fooled by git-fetch working even with git-fetch-pack being broken in various ways, which should be fixed if we want to keep it. We also might as well deprecate peek-remote now that it's a synonym for ls-remote. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*