From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [WIP PATCH] Add 'git fast-export', the sister of 'git fast-import' Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:10:41 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <20071123205958.GC14735@spearce.org> <20071125170019.GB25800@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20071127101614.GB26072@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> <20071127145103.GA30020@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , hanwen@xs4all.nl, git@vger.kernel.org To: Karl =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hasselstr=F6m?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 16:11:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ix25b-0002kL-DM for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:11:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755497AbXK0PKs (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:10:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755486AbXK0PKs (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:10:48 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:35877 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755354AbXK0PKr (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:10:47 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 15:10:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp043) with SMTP; 27 Nov 2007 16:10:45 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/PbdxJmHXPpV35thMW2qADnewgnUDF09g5dioHT2 6a01Rnn82+sonm X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20071127145103.GA30020@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Karl Hasselstr?m wrote: > On 2007-11-27 11:25:47 +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Ah, so you would like something like "git --interactive"? This is > > indeed a completely different scope than the fast-export thingie, > > Yes. Or rather, I _think_ that's what I want. The only numbers I have is > that StGit makes a number of trivial git calls that right now take on > the order of 10 ms apiece, so the first step in this direction would be > to build a simple prototype just to see what kind of speed-up one could > expect (both in the git calls, and in StGit overall). I'd rather see you using libgit-thin's Python binding. Ciao, Dscho