From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:48:16 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711271747210.27959@racer.site>
References: <200711252248.27904.jnareb@gmail.com> <fiet88$68n$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <e5bfff550711261125i92fb057i85d7217b18cd495d@mail.gmail.com>
 <figlf6$d48$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
To: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 18:48:47 2007
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Ix4Y5-0004D7-51
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:48:41 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757350AbXK0RsX (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:48:23 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757538AbXK0RsW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:48:22 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58418 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1757117AbXK0RsW (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:48:22 -0500
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 17:48:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp044) with SMTP; 27 Nov 2007 18:48:20 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1490710
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+8gYp8kxa8SVuq+sUnnnRFek8fXwEs2Zy+CMAfPA
	XPIwl/CBnF00Fw
X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site
In-Reply-To: <figlf6$d48$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/66249>

Hi,

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:

> Actually although I like C++, that's not the reason, the reason is that Qt
> is a significantly (IMHO) better toolkit than Tk.  It's more cross platform
> and looks a lot nicer.

Tcl/Tk was easier to install on a lot more platforms in my life than Qt.

Ciao,
Dscho