From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Teach 'git pull' about --rebase Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:02:30 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <7v3avy21il.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v3aurcjpq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <27E5EF3C-19EF-441C-BB12-0F5B29BEAEDB@midwinter.com> <8c5c35580711281310h8764a33pba48e65010abf859@mail.gmail.com> <7vhcj63uhw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <474DE4D5.6020407@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Lars Hjemli , Steven Grimm , Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Loeliger X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 28 23:03:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IxUzq-0005GM-DC for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:03:06 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756592AbXK1WCr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:02:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758154AbXK1WCq (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:02:46 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55138 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755672AbXK1WCq (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:02:46 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2007 22:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 28 Nov 2007 23:02:44 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18YoxEDM14YV2HY0GKvvWXOXW6Ry+8GX49Dmro07C 4yUh2W3/fouAHU X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <474DE4D5.6020407@freescale.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jon Loeliger wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Maybe not make this part of git-pull at all? merge and rebase have > > totally different impact on the resulting history, so perhaps a separate > > command that is a shorthand for "git fetch && git rebase" may help > > unconfuse the users. > > At long last, we can revive "git update"! No, we cannot. By now, too many aliases are called "update". Ciao, Dscho