From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC] git-gui USer's Survey 2007 (was: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <200711252248.27904.jnareb@gmail.com> <20071127012013.GG14735@spearce.org> <20071127015833.GL14735@spearce.org> <20071128232523.GE9174@efreet.light.src> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jakub Narebski , "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Hudec X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 29 00:48:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IxWe3-0003EN-5B for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:48:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761413AbXK1XsY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:48:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759061AbXK1XsY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:48:24 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41955 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755211AbXK1XsX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:48:23 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2007 23:48:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO openvpn-client) [138.251.11.103] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 29 Nov 2007 00:48:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+U481gqJqU/yU6reP5RaB832esuzuwPSp/T8PkU1 Jfl35J6vwrq2XX X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20071128232523.GE9174@efreet.light.src> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Jan Hudec wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:32:10 +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > 4. If git-gui would use other language/toolkit, would you > > > contribute? > > > Yes/No > > > > Yes, as long as it is a language/toolkit that is available on all > > platforms that I (have to) work. That pretty much excludes C# and > > Python as a language. > > Out of interest, where does neither of those two work and Qt and tcl/tk do? > Mono and python both seem to be quite portable. IRIX (an ancient one). Besides, Mono is darned slow. Even Tcl/Tk is faster. Furthermore, my complaint was not about a platform where neither C# nor Python work. That is irrelevant. If you have one platform where only one works, and another platform where only the other works, you cannot have a single program for both platforms. Right? Hth, Dscho