From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reorder msgfmt command-line arguments. Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:05:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <20071203012631.GA22450@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> <20071203170402.GA13712@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "brian m. carlson" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 03 19:06:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IzFgh-0003FX-47 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:06:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751404AbXLCSGO (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:06:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751358AbXLCSGO (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:06:14 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49205 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751338AbXLCSGO (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:06:14 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Dec 2007 18:06:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 03 Dec 2007 19:06:11 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX194NWFszkx4cVjHLFeAaDtFvE+/oWGTbZeVRBjwwS yDk5S9Kx4citO5 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20071203170402.GA13712@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:35:33AM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, brian m. carlson wrote: > > > > > Any program using getopt or getopt_long will stop processing options > > > once a non-option argument has been encountered, if POSIXLY_CORRECT > > > is set. > > > > So have you tested that msgfmt indeed does not work with the present > > command line? > > Yes. I run with POSIXLY_CORRECT set to 1, and it does indeed break. I > wouldn't have fixed it if it had worked. Ah, so it is a not-so-common breakage. Thanks for clarifying, Dscho