From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Many things pushed out to 'master' Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <7vk5nwu51x.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vabosse23.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbq98jdy5.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1wa3iquj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 03 19:40:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IzGD4-0007V5-96 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:40:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752668AbXLCSji (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:39:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751338AbXLCSji (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:39:38 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33068 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752648AbXLCSjh (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:39:37 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Dec 2007 18:39:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 03 Dec 2007 19:39:36 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18/Qq9OZ0I/yqHf674FGBPBTtqUroLVy333nK697B 4c0QbsYz6pkA/b X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7v1wa3iquj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > But I remembered that you requested a mode for signed tags where they > > would just be copied. I just realised while implementing "verbatim" > > that "ignore" does just that. Maybe we should rename this mode to > > "verbatim"? > > > > And maybe you want to make it the default (even if I think that this > > will result in more surprise moments than the current mode which > > aborts). > > I did not hear others agreeing with me, so let's respect the original > author's thinking. But the original author already admitted that the original naming was stupid... Ciao, Dscho