From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Some git performance measurements.. Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:37:30 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Steffen Prohaska , Junio C Hamano , Nicolas Pitre , Linus Torvalds , Jakub Narebski , Git Mailing List To: Mike Ralphson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 07 19:39:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0i63-00009A-2Q for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:38:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754129AbXLGSiI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:38:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754297AbXLGSiI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:38:08 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33577 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754129AbXLGSiG (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:38:06 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Dec 2007 18:38:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO openvpn-client) [138.251.11.103] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 07 Dec 2007 19:38:03 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+0ETQXpjK0LWEfaFNq5BkVqiY0fbGuHTUo63Z89c hAj9mP+xXHomdI X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Mike Ralphson wrote: > On Dec 7, 2007 1:49 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Mike Ralphson wrote: > > > > > I benchmarked 3 alternative qsorts, qsortG [2] was the fastest on my > > > system but has funky licensing, the NetBSD qsort was middle-range > > > and the glibc one the slowest of the three (but that could be due to > > > it being tuned for a "Sun 4/260"). All of them show over 100x speed > > > improvements on a git-status of my main repo (104s -> ~0.7s) > > > > How is "You may use it in anything you like;" funky licensing? It is > > effectively public domain. > > I did ask what the git licensing policy was (GPL2 or GPL2-compatible) > but got no response. The author's wishes state: > > * This code may be reproduced freely provided > [long list] Okay, sorry, I did not bother reading further when I read "You may use it in anything you like;". But if the author did not respond, it might be a better idea to just reimplement it. Ciao, Dscho