Re: [ANNOUNCE] ugit: a pyqt-based git gui // was: Re: If you would write git from scratch now, what would you change?

[Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>]

Hi,

On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Jason Sewall wrote:

> On Dec 12, 2007 12:23 AM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> > > I use git-gui and gitk for my git graphical needs because they rock 
> > > and at the end of the day, the fonts and antialiasing aren't that 
> > > big of a deal, especially since I'm usually doing quick scans and 
> > > searches over the information those tools display, not reading 
> > > novels in them.
> >
> > Good points.  Features win over pretty most of the time.  But at some 
> > point pretty is important; especially to new user adoption. Plus if 
> > you are looking at it all day long it shouldn't be jarring to the 
> > eyes.  But git-gui still isn't even where I want it ot be 
> > feature-wise.  E.g. I'd *love* to teach it inotify support, so you 
> > don't even need to have that Rescan button.
> 
> On that note, did you see what I wrote above, about having "split hunk" 
> functionality?

I had a patch for splitting hunks in git-gui in August, but there were 
some issues that I did not yet resolve.  If you want to work on it, I'll 
gladly share that patch with you.

Ciao,
Dscho