From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Unknown Subject: Re: [PATCH] git status -q (similar to subversion) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20090628224447.GB1951@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Aguilar X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 29 21:39:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MLMhN-0004E3-TP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:39:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753325AbZF2TjT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:39:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752775AbZF2TjS (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:39:18 -0400 Received: from borg.uu3.net ([87.99.63.19]:49366 "EHLO borg.uu3.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752548AbZF2TjR (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:39:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by borg.uu3.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAD9633D1; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:39:18 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: borg@cube In-Reply-To: <20090628224447.GB1951@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, David Aguilar wrote: > Hello Hi and thanks for reply. > Please take a look at Documentation/SubmittingPatches > (all of the documentation lives in Documentation/). > > It doesn't seem like this patch was generated with > git format-patch. You'll also want to submit your patch using > git send-email, as we require inline patches instead of > attachments. Right. I though such a small patch can be provided as is. Anyway, I will take necessary steps to peform better next time. The question is, would that patch will be applied anyway? I already received some criticism about not applying it. I can only answer that where svn status and git status differ in many cases, there are also similar in some. For now, I would rather want to see a discus about it (Pro vs Cons). Other solution I see is add extra config variable like: status.showUntrackedDefault = (no|normal|all) So when you peform 'git status -u' it will be used. Looks better to me if we really want to have difference between git status vs svn status. Regards, Borg