* Re: git ability
2021-02-13 13:25 git ability PANEL Christian
@ 2021-02-13 17:25 ` brian m. carlson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: brian m. carlson @ 2021-02-13 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: PANEL Christian; +Cc: git
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2633 bytes --]
On 2021-02-13 at 13:25:03, PANEL Christian wrote:
> hello,
>
> does git have the ability to handle a repository on a removable disk?
Yes, this is possible. You should access it from only one operating
system at a time.
I also strongly recommend that if you're going to do this across
operating systems, you use UDF[0] and not NTFS, FAT, or exFAT for this
purpose. Linux can format drives this way for use across OSes.
> here is the experience I had:
>
> I have a project that I manage on a removable disk (therefore with a
> ".git" directory on it).
>
> until now I did "commits" and "push" on the server from windows10.
>
> I made changes to the source and made a "commit" from linux (on the
> same computer). Git asked me again for my username (email and user
> name): I then thought that these were not stored in the ".git"
> directory
These settings, user.name and user.email, _can_ be stored in
.git/config, but _usually_ are stored in the user's home directory,
which will differ between operating systems. You can use the "git
config" tool to set them appropriately if you'd like. I personally sync
my dotfiles across machines, which includes .gitconfig, which is an
approach many others use as well.
> I then saw a new branch called "linuxcompatibility" appear.
>
> I would like to understand.
Git doesn't create branches unless requested. It's possible that some
other tool on your system did. For example, if you're using a file
syncing service (e.g., Dropbox or OneDrive) to sync data, that's
definitely not recommended and can cause problems like this. If you're
using WSL instead of a true Linux system, that data could also have been
created by Windows.
It's also possible that this branch already existed on the server and it
may have shown up as a remote tracking branch with "git branch -a", in
which case attempting to check it out may have created a local copy.
Without more details or output from a program, it's hard to say what's
going on here.
> I thought to myself that I would then merge the "linuxcompatibility"
> branch to the "master" branch and push it all back to the server.
>
> if that went well with me, on the server the branch
> "linuxcompatibility" remained.
If you want to delete a branch on the remote server, you can do this:
git push -d origin linuxcompatibility
If you want to delete a branch locally, you can do this:
git branch -d linuxcompatibility
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Disk_Format; v2.01 is
recommended.
--
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Houston, Texas, US
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread