Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2021, #03; Tue, 13)

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2911 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 02:57:23PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 04:33:54AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:35:36AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:07:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > >> > [snip]
> > >> > > * ps/perf-with-separate-output-directory (2021-07-02) 1 commit
> > >> > >  - perf: fix when running with TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
> > >> > > 
> > >> > >  Test update.
> > >> > > 
> > >> > >  What's the status of this one?
> > >> > 
> > >> > From my point of view this is ready, but it's still missing reviews so
> > >> > far. The lack of interest seems to indicate that nobody has hit the
> > >> > issue so far, and I wonder why that is. Am I the only one who sets
> > >> > TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY to a tmpfs directory in his config.mak to speed up
> > >> > tests?
> > >> 
> > >> I had marked it to look at, but just hadn't gotten around to it. I just
> > >> gave it a review (but the upshot is that it looks fine to me).
> > >> 
> > >> I don't set TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY myself; instead I do:
> > >> 
> > >>   GIT_TEST_OPTS = --root=/path/to/tmpfs
> > >> 
> > >> TBH, I had never really considered using TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY for this
> > >> (--root predates it, and was written explicitly for the tmpfs case). But
> > >> I also think --root is more convenient:
> > >> 
> > >>   - "make test" will run in the tmpfs for speed, but "./t1234-foo.sh -i"
> > >>     will run locally, which makes it easy to "cd" in to inspect the
> > >>     result
> > >> 
> > >>   - likewise, I find accessing the results in t/test-results/*.out a
> > >>     little more convenient
> > >> 
> > >> But all of that is preference. I don't think you're wrong to use
> > >> TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY this way, but the above points might be
> > >> interesting to you.
> > >
> > > It is, thanks a lot for the hint. But given your first point about
> > > direct execution, this in fact makes me want TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY in
> > > contrast to `--root=/path/to/tmpfs`: especially in the context of perf
> > > tests, I never run all of them together given that it takes such a long
> > > time. So I instead either run them directly or via the `./run` script,
> > > and in both cases I definitely want to have them in tmpfs given that
> > > there's a lot of disk churn if you're using biggish repos.
> > >
> > > Patrick
> > 
> > Thanks, all.  Let me mark the patch for 'next'.
> 
> OK, if you don't care that TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY is broken, so be it.

I just think we shouldn't strip away features if we should instead look
at why the testcase is broken and how to fix the root cause. I'll send a
patch in a minute which fixes the testcase without dropping support for
TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]