Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: ignore SIGPIPE when writing to index-pack
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 17:32:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZgl5qYbAyAsixmo@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy25jokft.fsf@gitster.g>

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 02:21:58PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > When fetching, we send the incoming pack to index-pack (or
> > unpack-objects) via the sideband demuxer. If index-pack hits an error
> > (e.g., because an object fails fsck), then it will die immediately. This
> > may cause us to get SIGPIPE on the fetch, as we're still trying to write
> > pack contents from the sideband demuxer (which is typically a thread,
> > and thus takes down the whole fetch process).
> 
> So, ... we'd die anyway and won't update the refs and anything that
> leaves permanent damage to the repository either way, but we choose
> a better way to die by not taking SIGPIPE, but to get an error from
> one of the write()s or the final close(), which will lead us to more
> "controlled" death using the normal error path?

Yes, exactly. We'll be exiting either way; it's just a matter of racily
changing the exit code and possibly the error message from the parent
fetch process.

So I do doubt this really hurts users much in practice, but making the
tests robust seems worth it to me (because I found it after tracking
down a flaky test failure). And because it _is_ a race in the code, I
fixed it there rather than papering over the SIGPIPE exit in the test
script.

-Peff

      reply	other threads:[~2021-11-19 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-19 20:58 [PATCH] fetch-pack: ignore SIGPIPE when writing to index-pack Jeff King
2021-11-19 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-11-19 22:32   ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZgl5qYbAyAsixmo@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox