git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Cc: Shubham Mishra <shivam828787@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] avoid pipes with Git on LHS
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 13:01:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhZ2Zpl3XGkTKxuI@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJyCBOTiWxAgkZPB6M5jPw=t=32zrnNH5tfnOc9Kdj9mKayrSA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:19:23PM +0800, Shaoxuan Yuan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 8:42 PM Shubham Mishra <shivam828787@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am using mails for code review for the first time, I have some
> > doubts, Can someone please clarify them? -
> > 1. It looks like the cover letter (Including "Range-diff" section) is
> > only for context sharing with reviewers, nothing from it gets merged
> > to the "seek" or any other branch.
>
> The cover letter stands for an introduction/summary to your patches.
> You can also put helpful context in it for better understanding. According
> to my knowledge, it will not be in the commit messages.

Right; the cover letter (along with any notes below the '---' in your
patches do not make it into the commit history).

The range-diff you posted is empty and doesn't look quite right to me...
when I applied both versions of your patches locally and generated a
range-diff myself, I got the expected (non-empty) results.

I'm not sure exactly how you're generating the range-diff locally, but
you may want to make sure that you're picking the previous version
correctly (and not doing something like `git range-diff master HEAD
HEAD`, which is what I suspect may have happened).

> > 2. I wanted to know how the merging process takes place. Once the
> > patch is accepted, do we merge all previous versions of it one after
> > another or every patch is independent so we have to just merge the
> > last accepted patch?
>
> Not so sure about this question. My two cents: generally the most agreed-upon
> patch will be merged, but the exact merging process could vary based
> on the circumstances. Probably Junio can have a better answer to this.

Emily Shaffer did some great work a couple of years ago on a "My First
Contribution" tutorial, which you can find in
Documentation/MyFirstContribution.txt.

The section "My Patch Got Emailed - Now What?" provides a good overview
of the review and queuing process.

Thanks,
Taylor

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-23 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22 11:43 [PATCH 0/2] microproject: avoid using pipes in test Shubham Mishra
2022-02-22 11:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] t0001: remove pipes Shubham Mishra
2022-02-22 13:54   ` Derrick Stolee
2022-02-22 18:16     ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-22 20:32   ` Christian Couder
2022-02-23 21:07     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-24  3:28       ` Christian Couder
2022-02-22 11:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] t0003: " Shubham Mishra
2022-02-22 13:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] microproject: avoid using pipes in test Derrick Stolee
2022-02-22 14:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-02-22 19:12   ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-22 19:39   ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] avoid pipes with Git on LHS Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 11:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t0001: " Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 17:53     ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-23 18:01       ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 18:02         ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-23 21:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-24  5:14       ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 11:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] t0003: " Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 17:54     ` Taylor Blau
2022-02-23 19:59       ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 12:08   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Shubham Mishra
2022-02-23 13:19     ` Shaoxuan Yuan
2022-02-23 18:01       ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2022-02-23 20:04         ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-24  3:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] microproject: avoid using pipes in test Christian Couder
2022-02-24  5:22   ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-24  9:29     ` Christian Couder
2022-02-24 10:13       ` Shubham Mishra
2022-02-24 18:22         ` Christian Couder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YhZ2Zpl3XGkTKxuI@nand.local \
    --to=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com \
    --cc=shivam828787@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).