From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CCCC43334 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232178AbiGLG6j (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:58:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229670AbiGLG6i (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:58:38 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C50611145 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 23:58:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10456 invoked by uid 109); 12 Jul 2022 06:58:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:58:35 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 27694 invoked by uid 111); 12 Jul 2022 06:58:35 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:58:35 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:58:35 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Han Xin Cc: chiyutianyi@gmail.com, derrickstolee@github.com, git@vger.kernel.org, haiyangtand@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com, git@grubix.eu, me@ttaylorr.com, Junio C Hamano , ps@pks.im Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] no lazy fetch in lookup_commit_in_graph() Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:50:46PM +0800, Han Xin wrote: > Changes since v4: > > * Remove run_with_limited_processses() as it can be catched by CI > settings and developer workstation. Keeping it will make a trouble > when there are too many prcesses or stress is used. Your v4 is already in 'next', so I think rather than replacing the patch, we'd want a commit on top to remove run_with_limited_processes(). -Peff