From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from silver.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net (silver.cherry.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.223.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7EFA1C5D63 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=23.83.223.166 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744226004; cv=pass; b=rw4NYjuSCf3DGnLRVrY4MojBIw8XQk8Xqjzy3qegwrVLwfUtFo1/EbTO/OPAgsKzLlM1Y4DVmL+5wDF9v1Qml/skWW6/tVCpUsfjG8N+y+VooLvIVgV+qbc/vyUuQZ8E+v+Qe+8N4cMNJxM1XKOXMcQDLqPEx4Ruumd14Wm7GC4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744226004; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RmCUbxqLRhraTeiZ367iP+1HwPxx0HqabC0hqCN9shg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XztmqpEM2Ec0RXAUk27jCUK4tm7k/DxGu66Ra0pN8k62UEBG0TLoG56pROL/73F8FLCnNeso688AKFB9ppnavipjIjyX7gzGNicBsc5GE1SdYkOHui2axptMYaVu0zPuGcO/rMZD4qiNhV8MO0p7M8VYLq9dU344Rfws4rt1PJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cryptonector.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cryptonector.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com header.i=@cryptonector.com header.b=loisl9om; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=23.83.223.166 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cryptonector.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cryptonector.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com header.i=@cryptonector.com header.b="loisl9om" X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81447830CF; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a228.dreamhost.com (100-99-49-173.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.99.49.173]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 78358783711; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 19:13:21 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1744226001; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Bn+2irFzqDC7p1HQ33YH7ZF89LEh8OP0pWG4RhC3vMszvMsia+OcGV+1aOZXHo8MzZyFjB UDlTOm+TB9axwjh8yf+/r0Pkw1n+GHXAXeN96ljT/82VANFElDr6X0F0RFTDC/De1P12Eo BduKSCDqSa+Exa28iX+fSh5iQ9fmeiokN4BEIEDpxJOxu8x5MNp3U072xojL3AyR70x9uK bqVxCBGv1TRQ+uVPkHgFQqYFkKGoEI5TmwQNkiH9JS57id9WezN0lNieIBufaVMDqjh2ps OM4AnYpn+vttiGjyUqLxLZwkf8Rko9BrvmidMvK10DJV0YFUDbIepb+ZD5RqvQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1744226001; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=XOz5WWzmAlZLAP4GrvGYNjV9yTTrVZ+lzKO/YPiz2Wk=; b=gxqD6WNsNnbuINHSGy1wSsxd+9tMlGyTWdjuh1t546+7Xtf4fWr6giDJ9ovNmsi9pQmzL4 EAEXCC40traek1SOOleSPC3YWleWuuCSGqT4JS2bXW6EpeJ7vVBwEmm4pnNA7Wpn4Ry9Pr c738RQ5RJFOTMDBf/9A+MZvmPJgva5jvHEVtnWGRi9RqWMJ0NuNT0ouZycNt3vc1ZZlXrW FsiLXzxEtb8mxslmh4y26Hj+xJAHKglC9JrXvliYRPlNx0pCMPYDAv/mfBHkejBzfYhb4d Zyd6FBOM4I3JBAwXy0f0NvaTQT0dFE4ZZibi98hTayDu0LzxYgC001CFuD1lNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-6c89d5bdcb-pffrk; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=nico@cryptonector.com X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Power-Descriptive: 49a2dead5558970b_1744226001763_3272045203 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1744226001763:3214762336 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1744226001763 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a228.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.99.49.173 (trex/7.0.3); Wed, 09 Apr 2025 19:13:21 +0000 Received: from ubby (syn-075-081-095-064.res.spectrum.com [75.81.95.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a228.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ZXszh39kMz8v; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:13:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; s=dreamhost; t=1744226001; bh=XOz5WWzmAlZLAP4GrvGYNjV9yTTrVZ+lzKO/YPiz2Wk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Content-Type; b=loisl9omPSu1DrxODEast3biU4cccBrY32BFdQ19jQZSpVobVpUV9UfvcB/Hdjxwe +TZGBBDN57ClZCl71o2IChXa8NnBPsHYMw8+xhAqKtOe749+Ubh5wH/U02NmfOWklu za9pXQEtZqWQNJOSV7uGaSZyPJEBDs1hUjCmD1jZN4kGrTkdLjgfSACKla8FJy3itG 30prALzNswzFiu8mT4hOuxAzf75+ffzV5FV80f50M3kRAo4VgT7llFY4T0hzogYRFv xd1+G62+qWoBl3cWuDW7HxEVjaXDNDqxPgISnpTs2jANrNvfu+BAPJXkEn8emE9Agn D5D7GljZ8z4Nw== Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 14:13:18 -0500 From: Nico Williams To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Martin von Zweigbergk , Git Mailing List , Edwin Kempin , Scott Chacon , remo@buenzli.dev, "philipmetzger@bluewin.ch" Subject: Re: Gerrit, GitButler, and Jujutsu projects collaborating on change-id commit footer Message-ID: References: <20250408125521.GA17892@mit.edu> <20250409121924.GA148735@mit.edu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 05:56:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > It is not "simpler is more manageable". > > The early days' design decision, which still lives to this day, was > a bit stronger than that. As can be read from [*1*] (which by the > way I consider one of the most important message regarding the > design in early days of Git), the design started from "recording > renames is pointless". > > *1* https://lore.kernel.org/git/Pine.LNX.4.58.0504150753440.7211@ppc970.osdl.org/ Allow me to withdraw my use of similarity heuristics for renames as an argument against similarity heuristics over change IDs. I still think that explicit change IDs would be better than using only commit similarity heuristics. Nico --