From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: rsbecker@nexbridge.com
Cc: 'Junio C Hamano' <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.48.0-rc0
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:37:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2XHfzLEBUfqygBq@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <015501db5314$b61ac2a0$225047e0$@nexbridge.com>
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 02:23:49PM -0500, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
> On December 20, 2024 2:08 AM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 03:46:20PM -0500, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
> >> On December 18, 2024 11:07 AM, I wrote:
> >> >All tests, actually.
> >> >
> >> >$ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_REF_FORMAT=reftable GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB=true sh
> >> >t0000- basic.sh --verbose -i -x
> >> >error: reftable: transaction prepare: out of memory
> >> >error: cannot run git init
> >>
> >> Any updates or hypothesis on this? Our test system has loads of memory
> >> - I cannot figure out where the allocation failure takes place. There
> >> is a limit to how much memory can be allocated, but it is very high
> >> and our virtual memory is extensive, but this is a 32-bit build.
> >
> >My hypothesis is that this is caused by ps/reftable-alloc-failures, but I
> am unable to
> >tell where exactly the error comes from. So I'm dependent on your input.
> >
> >Could you please bisect the error? Finding out where the error is raised
> would also
> >be quite helpful. It has to be one of the reftable functions that returns
> >REFTABLE_OUT_OF_MEMORY_ERROR, but other than that I do not have any more
> >gut feeling right now.
>
> This is what bisect shows:
>
> git bisect start
> # status: waiting for both good and bad commits
> # good: [777489f9e09c8d0dd6b12f9d90de6376330577a2] Git 2.47
> git bisect good 777489f9e09c8d0dd6b12f9d90de6376330577a2
> # status: waiting for bad commit, 1 good commit known
> # bad: [063bcebf0c917140ca0e705cbe0fdea127e90086] Git 2.48-rc0
>
> git bisect bad 063bcebf0c917140ca0e705cbe0fdea127e90086
> # bad: [2037ca85ad93ec905b46543df6df4080f6ca258b] worktree: refactor
> `repair_worktree_after_gitdir_move()`
> git bisect bad 2037ca85ad93ec905b46543df6df4080f6ca258b
> # bad: [6a11438f43469f3815f2f0fc997bd45792ff04c0] The fifth batch
> git bisect bad 6a11438f43469f3815f2f0fc997bd45792ff04c0
> # bad: [f004467b042d735a2fe8bd5706b053b04b1aec65] Merge branch
> 'jh/config-unset-doc-fix'
> git bisect bad f004467b042d735a2fe8bd5706b053b04b1aec65
> # bad: [e29296745dc92fb03f8f60111b458adc69ff84c5] Merge branch
> 'sk/doc-maintenance-schedule'
> git bisect bad e29296745dc92fb03f8f60111b458adc69ff84c5
> # bad: [5b67cc6477ce88c499caab5ebcebd492ec78932d] reftable/stack: handle
> allocation failures in auto compaction
> git bisect bad 5b67cc6477ce88c499caab5ebcebd492ec78932d
> # good: [31f5b972e0231d4211987775dd58e67815734989] reftable/record: handle
> allocation failures when decoding records
> git bisect good 31f5b972e0231d4211987775dd58e67815734989
> # bad: [18da60029319733e2d931f2758a8e47b8b25b117] reftable/reader: handle
> allocation failures for unindexed reader
> git bisect bad 18da60029319733e2d931f2758a8e47b8b25b117
> # good: [74d1c18757d1a45b95e46836adf478193a34c42c] reftable/writer: handle
> allocation failures in `reftable_new_writer()`
> git bisect good 74d1c18757d1a45b95e46836adf478193a34c42c
This is missing the last step for git-bisect(1). Right now it could be
caused by one of these commits:
18da600293 (reftable/reader: handle allocation failures for unindexed reader, 2024-10-02)
802c0646ac (reftable/merged: handle allocation failures in `merged_table_init_iter()`, 2024-10-02)
The first commit seems quite unlikely to be the root cause. The second
commit is rather interesting though. I wonder whether NonStop's malloc
returns a NULL pointer when given a size of 0?
A quick stab into the dark, but does below patch on top of `master` make
things work for you?
Patrick
-- >8 --
diff --git a/reftable/merged.c b/reftable/merged.c
index bb0836e344..7ae6f78d45 100644
--- a/reftable/merged.c
+++ b/reftable/merged.c
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int merged_table_init_iter(struct reftable_merged_table *mt,
struct merged_iter *mi = NULL;
int ret;
- REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(subiters, mt->readers_len);
+ REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(subiters, mt->readers_len + 1);
if (!subiters) {
ret = REFTABLE_OUT_OF_MEMORY_ERROR;
goto out;
diff --git a/reftable/stack.c b/reftable/stack.c
index 59fd695a12..1b6b8cc9ea 100644
--- a/reftable/stack.c
+++ b/reftable/stack.c
@@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ static uint64_t *stack_table_sizes_for_compaction(struct reftable_stack *st)
int overhead = header_size(version) - 1;
uint64_t *sizes;
- REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(sizes, st->merged->readers_len);
+ REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY(sizes, st->merged->readers_len + 1);
if (!sizes)
return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-20 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 18:14 [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.48.0-rc0 Junio C Hamano
2024-12-17 0:07 ` rsbecker
2024-12-17 4:51 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-17 13:47 ` rsbecker
2024-12-17 14:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-17 16:18 ` rsbecker
2024-12-17 19:00 ` rsbecker
2024-12-18 6:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-18 16:07 ` rsbecker
2024-12-19 20:46 ` rsbecker
2024-12-20 7:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-20 19:23 ` rsbecker
2024-12-20 19:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-12-20 21:21 ` rsbecker
2024-12-21 11:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-21 15:11 ` rsbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2XHfzLEBUfqygBq@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).