From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Seyi Chamber <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Outreachy] Blog: Introducing myself as an intern working to convert unit test to use clar
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:41:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2glK5uJOX6ARFUa@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGedMtfDMj5P0T6x3soe3OUhRbpSw_-m1Vcm+rhDat1vvReK9w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 02:22:38PM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 at 08:23, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 11:37:23AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I just published a new blog post on unit test scripts I've selected
> > > and prioritized for initial conversion to clar. I would love for you
> > > to check it out and share your opinion!
> > >
> > > Find the link here:
> > > https://seyi-kuforiji-902b48.gitlab.io/posts/week-2-prioritizing-test-scripts
> >
> > Thanks for the blog post! The initial selection looks reasonable to me.
> > I was wondering whether it would make sense to evict "t-reftable-tree.c"
> > out of the first batch and then handle all reftable-related tests in a
> > single patch series. But we've got 9 of those, some of which are quite
> > complex, so that patch series would become quite large overall. So I
> > guess it's sensible to distribute the conversion of the reftable tests
> > across different patch series.
> >
> > Patrick
>
> I suppose I could still make that work if that's your recommendation.
> I could divide the reftable-related tests into two sets and then treat
> them together. What do you think?
I'll leave it up to you, as there is no "right" or "wrong" in this
context.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-22 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAGedMtcSSkmQ2u9yYvKMiWnprWR2VZrbuoT9EX+U6nuxOWiEHw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-12-20 10:37 ` [Outreachy] Blog: Introducing myself as an intern working to convert unit test to use clar Seyi Chamber
2024-12-22 7:22 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-22 13:22 ` Seyi Chamber
2024-12-22 14:41 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-12-24 8:58 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-01-11 8:30 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-01-20 14:38 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-02-11 7:29 ` [Outreachy] Blog: Reflecting on tests converted to Clar (second batch) Seyi Chamber
2025-03-11 12:07 ` [Outreachy] Blog: Completion of My Outreachy Internship Seyi Chamber
2024-12-11 15:32 [Outreachy] Blog: Introducing myself as an intern working to convert unit test to use clar Seyi Chamber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2glK5uJOX6ARFUa@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuforiji98@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).