From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 13:48:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z30ipNB88iyaWMBT@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD1ALC2f9iQady35MCdm18V3u9+b0iRhgx2Zd_UTeCY8vA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 02:25:23PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:51 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> >
> > The "linux-gcc-default" job is mostly doing the same as the "linux-gcc"
> > job, except for a couple of minor differences:
> >
> > - We use an explicit GCC version instead of the default version
> > provided by the distribution. We have other jobs that test with
> > "gcc-8", making this distinction pointless.
> >
> > - We don't set up the Python version explicitly, and instead use the
> > default Python version. Python 2 has been end-of-life for quite a
> > while now though, making this distinction less interesting.
> >
> > - We set up the default branch name to be "main" in "linux-gcc". We
> > have other testcases that don't and also some that explicitly use
> > "master".
> >
> > So overall, the job does not add much to our test coverage. Merge it
> > into our "linux-gcc" job to reduce our test matrix a bit.
>
> I understand that the subject uses "merge" as the space is limited
> there, but it might be better to be a bit more explicit here about
> what the patch is doing, which is:
>
> - making the "linux-gcc" job use the default version of gcc provided
> by the distribution (which is ubuntu-20.04) instead of "gcc-8",
> - removing the "linux-gcc-default" job.
But isn't that what "merging" is about? One merges the diff of side A
into B and then removes A. I don't have an idea for a better subject,
honestly.
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> > ---
> > .github/workflows/main.yml | 4 ----
> > .gitlab-ci.yml | 4 ----
> > ci/lib.sh | 5 -----
> > 3 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/.github/workflows/main.yml b/.github/workflows/main.yml
> > index 808ddc19b8a799abc414c6d6ba078a6e5be6bdfb..32d35d2257812f02121b20c3cae342d626481553 100644
> > --- a/.github/workflows/main.yml
> > +++ b/.github/workflows/main.yml
> > @@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ jobs:
> > pool: ubuntu-latest
> > - jobname: linux-gcc
> > cc: gcc
> > - cc_package: gcc-8
> > pool: ubuntu-20.04
>
> So linux-gcc uses ubuntu-20.04...
>
> > - jobname: linux-TEST-vars
> > cc: gcc
> > @@ -286,9 +285,6 @@ jobs:
> > - jobname: osx-gcc
> > cc: gcc-13
> > pool: macos-13
> > - - jobname: linux-gcc-default
> > - cc: gcc
> > - pool: ubuntu-latest
>
> ...while linux-gcc-default uses ubuntu-latest.
>
> This is not a big issue but I didn't see that mentioned in the
> differences between the two jobs listed in the commit message.
Fair, added now.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-11 10:56 [PATCH 0/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 13:06 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-12-13 5:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-11 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 13:20 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 13:20 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 13:25 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 15:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 12:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-01-07 13:54 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 7:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-06 13:24 ` Christian Couder
2025-01-06 15:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 12:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 16:55 ` rsbecker
2025-01-08 6:36 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-08 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-09 10:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-09 12:08 ` Robert Coup
2025-01-09 10:20 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-09 15:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-06 15:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Junio C Hamano
2025-01-07 12:48 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-07 16:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-20 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-20 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-21 21:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-20 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-21 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-22 11:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Makefile: wire up build option for deprecated features Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] ci: merge linux-gcc-default into linux-gcc Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ci: repurpose "linux-gcc" job for deprecations Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] builtin/pack-redundant: remove subcommand with breaking changes Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] remote: announce removal of "branches/" and "remotes/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-22 20:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-21 15:26 ` Jakub Wilk
2025-02-21 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-25 7:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-25 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-26 9:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z30ipNB88iyaWMBT@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).