From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] builtin/fast-import: fix segfault with unsafe SHA1
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 14:08:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z3fhK1ACzJfVehM2@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z3LNVzw9UlS7SWqe@nand.local>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:22:34PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 03:24:02PM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > diff --git a/builtin/fast-import.c b/builtin/fast-import.c
> > index 1fa2929a01b7dfee52b653248bba802884f6be6a..0f86392761abbe6acb217fef7f4fe7c3ff5ac1fa 100644
> > --- a/builtin/fast-import.c
> > +++ b/builtin/fast-import.c
> > @@ -1106,7 +1106,7 @@ static void stream_blob(uintmax_t len, struct object_id *oidout, uintmax_t mark)
> > || (pack_size + PACK_SIZE_THRESHOLD + len) < pack_size)
> > cycle_packfile();
> >
> > - the_hash_algo->init_fn(&checkpoint.ctx);
> > + the_hash_algo->unsafe_init_fn(&checkpoint.ctx);
>
> This will obviously fix the issue at hand, but I don't think this is any
> less brittle than before. The hash function implementation here needs to
> agree with that used in the hashfile API. This change makes that
> happen, but only using side information that the hashfile API uses the
> unsafe variants.
Yup, I only cared about fixing the segfault because we're close to the
v2.48 release. I agree that the overall state is still extremely brittle
right now.
[snip]
> I think we should perhaps combine forces here. My ideal end-state is to
> have the unsafe_hash_algo() stuff land from my earlier series, then have
> these two fixes (adjusted to the new world order as above), and finally
> the Meson fixes after that.
>
> Does that seem like a plan to you? If so, I can put everything together
> and send it out (if you're OK with me forging your s-o-b).
I think the ideal state would be if the hashing function used was stored
as part of `struct git_hash_ctx`. So the flow basically becomes for
example:
```
struct git_hash_ctx ctx;
struct object_id oid;
git_hash_sha1_init(&ctx);
git_hash_update(&ctx, data);
git_hash_final_oid(&oid, &ctx);
```
Note how the intermediate calls don't need to know which hash function
you used to initialize the `struct git_hash_ctx` -- the structure itself
should remember what it has been initilized with and do the right thing.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-03 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-30 14:24 [PATCH 00/10] Fix segfaults when using the unsafe SHA1 backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] bulk-checkin: fix segfault with " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] builtin/fast-import: " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 17:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] builtin/fast-import: fix segfault with unsafe SHA1 Taylor Blau
2025-01-03 13:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-01-03 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-06 19:17 ` Taylor Blau
2025-01-07 12:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-01-08 19:21 ` Taylor Blau
2025-01-09 5:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] ci: exercise unsafe OpenSSL backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 17:31 ` Taylor Blau
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] meson: consistenlty spell 'CommonCrypto' Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] meson: deduplicate access to SHA1/SHA256 backend options Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] meson: require SecurityFramework when it's used as SHA1 backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] meson: simplify conditions for HTTPS and SHA1 dependencies Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] meson: add missing dots for build options Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] meson: wire up unsafe SHA1 backend Patrick Steinhardt
2024-12-30 14:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] meson: provide a summary of configured backends Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z3fhK1ACzJfVehM2@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).