From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: win+Meson test failures due to ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 topic?
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:35:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z77EJRJwPDGUglLk@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z76qYgV7B2eUJHiP@pks.im>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:45:06AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:45:47AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > As of yesterday, 'next' started failing all the "win+Meson test"
> > jobs.
> >
> > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13506034920
> >
> > I had to do one of my least favourite activities working on Git:
> > bisecting CI breakage on a platform I have no idea how well it
> > works.
> >
> > Here is the full "stack" of changes, it contains all the topics
> > merged between 'master' and 'next', plus a single change that
> > butchers .github/workflows/main.yml to leave only three jobs
> > (ci-config, windows-meson-build, and windows-meson-test).
> >
> > 3a7e83b527 Merge branch 'ps/build-meson-fixes-0130'
> > e59193e984 Merge branch 'ek/mingw-rename-symlink'
> > a209cf1427 Merge branch 'po/meson-perl-fix'
> > 9f1e73677c Merge branch 'ua/os-version-capability'
> > 82f01cb375 Merge branch 'ms/rename-match-name-with-pattern'
> > 8b04381049 Merge branch 'ad/set-default-target-in-makefiles'
> > 2cab1bd7d0 Merge branch 'pw/merge-tree-stdin-deadlock-fix'
> > 92b43de9df Merge branch 'mh/doc-commit-title-not-subject'
> > 685c150623 Merge branch 'bc/diff-reject-empty-arg-to-pickaxe'
> > c5093fc2d8 Merge branch 'tb/new-make-fix'
> > 9091607e95 Merge branch 'da/xdiff-w-sign-compare-workaround'
> > 01e86410fe GitHub CI: trim and slim for win+Meson test breakage hunting
> > 2d2a71ce85 The thirteenth batch
> >
> > At 01e86410fe and e59193e984, CI seems to pass.
> >
> > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13528755524
> >
> > With ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 at 3a7e83b527, all the "win+Meson
> > test" jobs fail. I suspect that the series does not break
> > individual tests but the breakage is in somewhere more
> > framework-ish? I didn't look into individual test job failures.
> >
> > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13529323827
> >
> > I'll also note that in one of my earlier attempts (which had
> > ek/mingw-rename-symlink merged before po/meson-perl-fix), one of the
> > 10 "win+Meson test" jobs failed ("win+Meson test (7)" to be exact).
> > Rerunning the failed test succeeds, so there must be something flaky
> > in t0610-reftable-basics test that is exposed by this change,
> > perhaps?
> >
> > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13528071468/attempts/1
> > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/13528071468/attempts/2
> >
> > As the ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 topic has 13 changes, and each
> > iteration in the above exercise took somewhere around 20 minutes, I
> > won't dive into the topic myself to identify which one of these
> > individual topics causes the breakage. This however gave me enough
> > to go on to today's 'master' integration (mainly, by mark the topic
> > to be held in 'next' until this gets resolved, and deal with the
> > other topics).
>
> Hm, interesting. I didn't notice those issues in our CI. Thanks for
> diving into it, I'll figure out what has happened here.
Okay, the issue was in 163a3e97ac1 (meson: simplify use of the
common-main library, 2025-01-30). In that commit we stopped using the
common-main dependency for a couple of binaries, including
git-remote-https and others. What I didn't realize though is that this
also made us not use the linker arguments anymore, but those are
required on Windows when linking an executable.
I've kicked off CI jobs on GitHub to verify that the revised version of
this patch series works alright. Once those tests pass I'll send another
version of this patch series.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 19:45 win+Meson test failures due to ps/build-meson-fixes-0130 topic? Junio C Hamano
2025-02-26 5:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-26 7:27 ` Jeff King
2025-02-26 7:35 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-02-26 7:46 ` Jeff King
2025-02-26 8:20 ` Jeff King
2025-02-26 9:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-02-26 22:07 ` Jeff King
2025-02-26 15:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-26 16:29 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z77EJRJwPDGUglLk@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox