From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gitweb.js build mistake
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:02:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8FfeEDHZocWHKeM@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <070641d0-730c-7d92-af4a-9157dc1edd3d@debian.org>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:34:43AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> From ed9863971d37ed53628a5871a4a569ccd6287f53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: mirabilos <tg@debian.org>
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:33:10 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Unbreak content of gitweb.js
>
> The former $^ adds all prerequisites, including the
> (proper) new dependency on the generator script.
The commit message could use a bit of polishing. How about the
following:
gitweb: fix generation of "gitweb.js"
In 19d8fe7da65 (Makefile: extract script to generate gitweb.js,
2024-12-06) we have extracted the logic to build "gitweb.js" into a
separate script. As part of that the rules that builds the script
has gained a new dependency on that script.
This refactoring is broken though because we use "$^" to determine
the set of JavaScript files that need to be concatenated, and this
implicit variable now also contains the build script itself. As a
result, the build script ends up ni the generated "gitweb.js" file,
which is wrong.
Fix the issue by explicitly only passing the JavaScript files.
> Signed-off-by: mirabilos <tg@debian.org>
We typically require plain names instead of aliases in the SOB.
> ---
> gitweb/Makefile | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gitweb/Makefile b/gitweb/Makefile
> index d5748e9359..2a8f97cef8 100644
> --- a/gitweb/Makefile
> +++ b/gitweb/Makefile
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)gitweb.cgi: $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)gitweb.perl
> $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)static/gitweb.js: $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)generate-gitweb-js.sh
> $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)static/gitweb.js: $(addprefix $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB),$(GITWEB_JSLIB_FILES))
> $(QUIET_GEN)$(RM) $@ $@+ && \
> - $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)generate-gitweb-js.sh $@+ $^ && \
> + $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB)generate-gitweb-js.sh $@+ $(addprefix $(MAK_DIR_GITWEB),$(GITWEB_JSLIB_FILES)) && \
> mv $@+ $@
We could avoid repetition by filtering out any files that we don't care
about, like so:
$(filter %.js,$^)
In any case, thanks for discovering and fixing this issue!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 5:34 gitweb.js build mistake Thorsten Glaser
2025-02-28 5:46 ` Simon Richter
2025-02-28 6:34 ` Thorsten Glaser
2025-02-28 7:02 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-03-27 10:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8FfeEDHZocWHKeM@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tg@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox