git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shejialuo <shejialuo@gmail.com>
To: Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [GSOC PATCH v2 2/2] attr: use `repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path()` and update callers
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 22:39:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9BLMLXJ7Desl-n6@ArchLinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250310151048.69825-3-ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:40:48PM +0530, Ayush Chandekar wrote:
> Update attribute-related functions to retrieve the "core.attributesfile"
> configuration via the new repository-scoped accessor
> `repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path()`. This improves behaviour in
> multi-repository contexts and aligns with the goal of minimizing
> reliance on global state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>
> ---
>  attr.c               | 28 ++++++++++------------------
>  attr.h               |  7 +++----
>  builtin/check-attr.c |  2 +-
>  builtin/var.c        |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/attr.c b/attr.c
> index 0bd2750528..8f28463e8c 100644
> --- a/attr.c
> +++ b/attr.c
> @@ -879,14 +879,6 @@ const char *git_attr_system_file(void)
>  	return system_wide;
>  }
>  
> -const char *git_attr_global_file(void)
> -{
> -	if (!git_attributes_file)
> -		git_attributes_file = xdg_config_home("attributes");
> -
> -	return git_attributes_file;
> -}
> -
>  int git_attr_system_is_enabled(void)
>  {
>  	return !git_env_bool("GIT_ATTR_NOSYSTEM", 0);
> @@ -906,7 +898,7 @@ static void push_stack(struct attr_stack **attr_stack_p,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void bootstrap_attr_stack(struct index_state *istate,
> +static void bootstrap_attr_stack(struct repository *repo, struct index_state *istate,

I have scanned the definition of the "struct index_state", there is a
"struct repository *repo" member in this data structure. This makes me
think why do we need to pass the "struct repository *repo" in the first
place. A design question, should we just use `istate->repo` directly?

>  				 const struct object_id *tree_oid,
>  				 struct attr_stack **stack)
>  {
> @@ -927,8 +919,8 @@ static void bootstrap_attr_stack(struct index_state *istate,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* home directory */
> -	if (git_attr_global_file()) {
> -		e = read_attr_from_file(git_attr_global_file(), flags);
> +	if (repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path(repo)) {
> +		e = read_attr_from_file(repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path(repo), flags);
>  		push_stack(stack, e, NULL, 0);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -946,7 +938,7 @@ static void bootstrap_attr_stack(struct index_state *istate,
>  	push_stack(stack, e, NULL, 0);
>  }
>  
> -static void prepare_attr_stack(struct index_state *istate,
> +static void prepare_attr_stack(struct repository *repo, struct index_state *istate,
>  			       const struct object_id *tree_oid,
>  			       const char *path, int dirlen,
>  			       struct attr_stack **stack)

If we use "istate->repo", we don't even need to change this function.

> @@ -969,7 +961,7 @@ static void prepare_attr_stack(struct index_state *istate,
>  	 * .gitattributes in deeper directories to shallower ones,
>  	 * and finally use the built-in set as the default.
>  	 */
> -	bootstrap_attr_stack(istate, tree_oid, stack);
> +	bootstrap_attr_stack(repo, istate, tree_oid, stack);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Pop the "info" one that is always at the top of the stack.

[snip]

Thanks,
Jialuo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-11 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-09 15:33 [PATCH] environment: move access to "core.attributesfile" into repo settings Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10  7:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-03-10  9:07   ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 16:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 17:21     ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 19:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-10 15:10 ` [GSOC PATCH v2 0/2] Stop depending on `the_repository` for core.attributesfile Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 15:10   ` [GSOC PATCH v2 1/2] environment: move access to "core.attributesfile" into repo settings Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 21:11     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-03-10 15:10   ` [GSOC PATCH v2 2/2] attr: use `repo_settings_get_attributesfile_path()` and update callers Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-10 21:17     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-03-10 23:08       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-11 17:41       ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-03-11 14:39     ` shejialuo [this message]
2025-03-11 17:03       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-11 17:20       ` Ayush Chandekar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9BLMLXJ7Desl-n6@ArchLinux \
    --to=shejialuo@gmail.com \
    --cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).