From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 01:18:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9OD8ihB-tiCdBmp@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy0x8l8tu.fsf@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1967 bytes --]
On 2025-03-14 at 01:06:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
> > index c3415ad7e0a..0aefd763751 100644
> > --- a/git-compat-util.h
> > +++ b/git-compat-util.h
> > @@ -1584,4 +1584,10 @@ static inline void *container_of_or_null_offset(void *ptr, size_t offset)
> > ((uintptr_t)&(ptr)->member - (uintptr_t)(ptr))
> > #endif /* !__GNUC__ */
> >
> > +#ifdef CHECK_ASSERTION_SIDE_EFFECTS
> > +#undef assert
> > +extern int not_supposed_to_survive;
> > +#define assert(expr) ((void)(not_supposed_to_survive || (expr)))
> > +#endif /* CHECK_ASSERTION_SIDE_EFFECTS */
>
> Cute. As this checking assert is in void context, the optimizing
> compiler knows that the entire thing can be optimized away ONLY IF
> it can somehow prove that (expr) has no side effect. And if it does
> not optimize it away, you will hit an error from the linker, saying
> that the undefined variable is being used.
I agree this is very clever.
> This requires a fairly good optimizing compiler that can peek into
> (as in "inline") what is in expr to notice, so it cannot be free of
> false positive, but at least when the optimization works as expected,
> it is provably (modulo optimizer bugs) side-effect free.
>
> Is this something we can use in our project? I am just double
> checking.
I believe it's valid in C99. Certainly some compiler might be bad at
optimizing, or a user may have compiled with -O0, but this is run in CI,
where we have known good compilers and can control the optimization
flags. I doubt GCC, Clang, or MSVC will have problems here, and since
this is not on by default, users using something less capable (the Tiny
C Compiler, maybe?) or a vendor compiler won't even see it.
Was there some other case that you were concerned about?
--
brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him)
Toronto, Ontario, CA
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-14 0:20 [PATCH 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-14 0:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] git-compat-util: introduce BUG_IF_NOT() macro Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-14 0:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-14 1:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 1:18 ` brian m. carlson [this message]
2025-03-14 1:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 1:27 ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-14 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-16 6:38 ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-17 15:45 ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-17 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] treewide: replace assert() with BUG_IF_NOT() in special cases Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-16 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-16 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] git-compat-util: introduce BUG_IF_NOT() macro Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-17 22:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-17 22:36 ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-16 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-17 22:30 ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-19 16:21 ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-19 22:26 ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-17 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-16 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: replace assert() with BUG_IF_NOT() in special cases Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-17 22:33 ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-17 22:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Taylor Blau
2025-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] git-compat-util: introduce ASSERT() macro Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] treewide: replace assert() with ASSERT() in special cases Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 22:27 ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-19 22:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9OD8ihB-tiCdBmp@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net \
--to=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).