git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 01:18:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9OD8ihB-tiCdBmp@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy0x8l8tu.fsf@gitster.g>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1967 bytes --]

On 2025-03-14 at 01:06:21, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
> > index c3415ad7e0a..0aefd763751 100644
> > --- a/git-compat-util.h
> > +++ b/git-compat-util.h
> > @@ -1584,4 +1584,10 @@ static inline void *container_of_or_null_offset(void *ptr, size_t offset)
> >  	((uintptr_t)&(ptr)->member - (uintptr_t)(ptr))
> >  #endif /* !__GNUC__ */
> >  
> > +#ifdef CHECK_ASSERTION_SIDE_EFFECTS
> > +#undef assert
> > +extern int not_supposed_to_survive;
> > +#define assert(expr) ((void)(not_supposed_to_survive || (expr)))
> > +#endif /* CHECK_ASSERTION_SIDE_EFFECTS */
> 
> Cute.  As this checking assert is in void context, the optimizing
> compiler knows that the entire thing can be optimized away ONLY IF
> it can somehow prove that (expr) has no side effect.  And if it does
> not optimize it away, you will hit an error from the linker, saying
> that the undefined variable is being used.

I agree this is very clever.

> This requires a fairly good optimizing compiler that can peek into
> (as in "inline") what is in expr to notice, so it cannot be free of
> false positive, but at least when the optimization works as expected,
> it is provably (modulo optimizer bugs) side-effect free.
> 
> Is this something we can use in our project?  I am just double
> checking.

I believe it's valid in C99.  Certainly some compiler might be bad at
optimizing, or a user may have compiled with -O0, but this is run in CI,
where we have known good compilers and can control the optimization
flags.  I doubt GCC, Clang, or MSVC will have problems here, and since
this is not on by default, users using something less capable (the Tiny
C Compiler, maybe?) or a vendor compiler won't even see it.

Was there some other case that you were concerned about?
-- 
brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-14  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14  0:20 [PATCH 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-14  0:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] git-compat-util: introduce BUG_IF_NOT() macro Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-14  0:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-14  1:06   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14  1:18     ` brian m. carlson [this message]
2025-03-14  1:20       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14  1:27         ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-14 17:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-16  6:38             ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-17 15:45               ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-17 22:27               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-14  0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] treewide: replace assert() with BUG_IF_NOT() in special cases Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-16  6:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-16  6:42   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] git-compat-util: introduce BUG_IF_NOT() macro Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-17 22:33     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-17 22:36       ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-16  6:42   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-17 22:30     ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-19 16:21       ` Elijah Newren
2025-03-19 22:26         ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-17 22:37     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-03-16  6:42   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] treewide: replace assert() with BUG_IF_NOT() in special cases Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-17 22:33     ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-17 22:34   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Taylor Blau
2025-03-19 16:22   ` [PATCH v3 " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 16:22     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] git-compat-util: introduce ASSERT() macro Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 16:22     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 16:22     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] treewide: replace assert() with ASSERT() in special cases Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2025-03-19 22:27       ` Taylor Blau
2025-03-19 22:27     ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Add a static analysis job to prevent assertions with side effects Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9OD8ihB-tiCdBmp@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net \
    --to=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).