From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAC1C77B73 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 19:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230435AbjDTTUB (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:20:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44814 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232003AbjDTTTx (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:19:53 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1131.google.com (mail-yw1-x1131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1131]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C582719 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1131.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-54fa9da5e5bso56074457b3.1 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:19:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1682018391; x=1684610391; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gkHOlq9tPmUtBq++kEx3gJQA06Jj2je4ORhtENNV1Xo=; b=gnYN9muXo59eJQb6I7sHqZbijIe304zP3fL9/MmbWvTRwIa1nwPO7vvGc1IN93IZyM h80gkIwS7zoukhopUYITxWBKZSK+CQvRZc5bpYvdk2pX9DwD7p0LpyZzi6iMVxvf5IDH BCLYYfX0DJ+Sf7zFdhI4sJI5xEnbZBOp5mU+KaeK4rzD/uQkO7KpeqS9aXf+S6qZ8pVZ qGcCKNx1VFbEHKhyxofT8JXQI8m0+bxvxiwNDleYmLsnPsdEp2kISgzco5x/ND3qUrgu t0yW/xM//b2g2A22x+wssNYccbxcDcmwtSzmQEXY1o4JkRb8gJ8CJHmW0W4vmJmVNERq cdPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682018391; x=1684610391; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gkHOlq9tPmUtBq++kEx3gJQA06Jj2je4ORhtENNV1Xo=; b=ll3pxJUO57t9zApKKbrH7C3L/ck6+4gZy0db/+7CRWg9fz4Bpdme9Pdddz2fwPqSqx oDcmp1UEyF/+KfFXxndhYssaGtBmCdI+2nNlvVv926Bb7PxAcMBBq0rAbkLj+kVyt22r keDlbqlXhhON8vZsVF/Dmli35UAee2woVRCpuzPLGzw1yJR0vvGzmGbGhEoi7cglJA9H GVLalNyW3mBEDbj84JO480DCOgkh97MBBggjLzSu/NWQC3rjLP/8r1d/3LwMSkgDp9ER eU94pgSArS+QezMErL5jKr4ESlHuh1lvJzsouIUI3SPPtwKiz1AoZ+gu69PhHVnV9zZ2 0byw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fBQGfgaTyO1GBPkfRUNOWjnsJsv+tsk6HZujW2gHxzuvqgeJ7f YEtFS3vIbeJBrtK2v0mrVPEt5vGePTt4WqTLaCQMlQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Zb96dkWEtHsVc/tw0fwpf9dp7/cRrzCDJM7FzAzZ6qbMXsILIuOahqXYX6P7HAru1WviP/qw== X-Received: by 2002:a81:6641:0:b0:54f:752e:9b09 with SMTP id a62-20020a816641000000b0054f752e9b09mr1398740ywc.15.1682018391080; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y73-20020a81a14c000000b0054f52b73ea8sm503431ywg.26.2023.04.20.12.19.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:19:49 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] builtin/gc.c: make `gc.cruftPacks` enabled by default Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:31:00AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau writes: > > >> Being listed here is a definite sign that a feature behind a > >> configuration variable is considered experimental. Do we have (and > >> if not, do we want to establish) a procedure to mark and announce a > >> feature that used to be experimental no longer is? If it is enough > >> to mention it in the release notes, then I can take care of it, of > >> course. > > > > I am not aware of such a procedure. But personally I think it would be > > fine to mention it in the release notes for the next release. > > OK. I updated the entry for the topic in the draft "What's cooking" > report to read: > > * tb/enable-cruft-packs-by-default (2023-04-18) 10 commits > - ... > > When "gc" needs to retain unreachable objects, packing them into > cruft packs (instead of exploding them into loose object files) has > been offered as a more efficient option for some time. Now the use > of cruft packs has been made the default and no longer considered > an experimental feature. > > Will merge to 'next'. > source: Thanks, I think that summarizes/announces the change well. I always appreciate your effort into concisely summarizing the topics being queued. > and the per-topic description text is usually what is copied > verbatim to the release notes, so even if I forget, the procedure > will remember it for us ;-) ;-). Thanks, Taylor