From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA13CA5505 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238821AbjIMILN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:11:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235580AbjIMILF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:11:05 -0400 Received: from bluemchen.kde.org (bluemchen.kde.org [209.51.188.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2251198E for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 01:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ugly.fritz.box (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluemchen.kde.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70952408D; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:10:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ugly.fritz.box (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1qgKxd-H1v-00; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:10:57 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:10:57 +0200 From: Oswald Buddenhagen To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Junio C Hamano , "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/32] doc hash-function-transition: Augment compatObjectFormat with readCompatMap Message-ID: References: <87sf7ol0z3.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20230908231049.2035003-2-ebiederm@xmission.com> <87sf7kd5xg.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87ledcb7ec.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87msxr8uc1.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87msxr8uc1.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 07:11:26AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >Oswald Buddenhagen writes: >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 06:46:19PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>>+The difference between compatObjectFormat and readCompatMap would be that >>>+compatObjectFormat would ask git to read existing maps, but would not ask >>>+git to write or create them. >>> >> the argument makes sense, but the asymmetry in the naming bugs me. in particular >> "[read]compatMap" seems too non-descript. > >I am open to suggestions for better names. > isn't readCompatObjectFormat an obvious choice? (and for symmetry, the other then would be writeCompatObjectFormat, i guess.) regards